Data anonymization ? or at least its subtype known as pseudonymization ? which There is will be described further below ? is one of the key recommendations listed in the GDPR. It’s noteworthy that the regulation elaborates on the concept of PII ? complementing the conventional name ? physical address ? and phone number with extra details such as IP addresses and electronic signatures. Furthermore ? compliance with the GDPR is mandatory for any non-EU company that handles data There is of EU residents or businesses.
Other privacy laws comparable to
The GDPR include the Canadian Personal Information list to data Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) and the Privacy Act highlighting Australia’s privacy principles. in the United States. The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) bears a resemblance to the GDPR in some ways ? but it’s a state-level regulation rather than federal law. That being said ? there are specific laws in effect that aim to guard the privacy of US citizens in different areas. The Health Insurance that’s where landing pages come in Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) fits the mold of this legislation ? serving as a privacy roadmap that pertains to medical information.
The Logic of Data Anonymization
There are plenty of techniques to mask data. Therefore ? companies common canada cell numbers practice don’t have to reinvent the wheel when trying to give their data privacy practices a boost. The caveat is that some of these mechanisms have limited efficiency. All in all ? the most common methods are as follows:
Aggregation: Data is accumulated in a de-personalized form. For instance ? people’s ages may not be logged as such ? but the total number of individuals of a specific age is known. This is what the personal data sold by businesses often looks like.